Question-1
Topic: The days of cheap food are over (Source: The Guardian) What are the consequences of increased food prices?
Do you think that certain foods should be protected from high price rises?
Title: The Impact of Rising Food Prices
Sample Answer:
Introduction:
In recent times, we’ve witnessed a shift in the accessibility of affordable food. Let’s explore both sides of the coin, starting with the argument in favor of increased food prices.
Argument in Favor:
On one hand, higher food prices can be seen as a necessary adjustment. Increased costs for production, transportation, and climate-related challenges are pushing prices up. This can potentially lead to improved agricultural practices, better sustainability, and fair compensation for farmers.
Argument Against:
However, the downside is undeniable. Rising food prices disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, exacerbating food insecurity and poverty. It creates a dilemma where basic necessities become luxuries for many, widening social and economic disparities.
Personal Reflection:
As we navigate these complex dynamics, my personal reflection centers on the need for a balanced approach. While economic forces shape food prices, we must be mindful of the humanitarian aspect. Ensuring access to essential nutrition for everyone should remain a priority, even as we acknowledge the economic realities.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the days of cheap food may indeed be dwindling, but our response to this challenge will define our future. Striking a balance between economic viability and social responsibility is crucial. As we discuss protecting certain foods from extreme price rises, let’s envision a future where sustainability, accessibility, and fairness coexist in our global food systems.
Thank you for your attention.
Question-2
Topic: “All students need a laptop. A portable device that can be carried to the library or to class is essential for studying effectively at university” (Source: National World). How far do you agree with this statement?
Title: The Role of Laptops in University Education
Sample Answer:
Today, I’d like to explore the statement that “all students need a laptop; a portable device that can be carried to the library or to class is essential for studying effectively at university.”
Argument in Favor:
Firstly, having a laptop provides students with unparalleled convenience and flexibility. With access to digital resources and the internet, students can easily research, collaborate, and stay organized. In-class note-taking becomes more efficient, and the ability to work on assignments from anywhere promotes a dynamic and adaptive learning environment.
For example, during my university years, having a laptop allowed me to collaborate seamlessly with peers on group projects. We could share documents, conduct virtual meetings, and collectively contribute to our assignments, irrespective of our physical locations.
Argument Against:
On the contrary, some argue that relying solely on laptops might hinder essential skills like critical thinking and handwriting. The tactile experience of writing notes by hand is believed to enhance memory retention. Additionally, a laptop’s potential for distraction—whether it be social media or unrelated websites—poses a risk to productivity during lectures.
While I acknowledge these concerns, it’s essential to note that the effectiveness of using laptops varies among individuals. Some students may thrive in a digital environment, while others might find traditional methods more beneficial.
Personal Reflection:
Personally, I found that integrating both digital and traditional methods worked best for me. While a laptop was invaluable for research and collaborative tasks, I still appreciated the tangible connection with my studies through handwritten notes. Striking a balance between the two allowed me to leverage the benefits of technology while preserving the cognitive benefits of traditional methods.
In conclusion, the role of laptops in university education is nuanced. While they offer undeniable advantages in terms of convenience and access to information, it’s crucial to recognize that different students have different learning styles. A one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable, and a thoughtful combination of digital and traditional methods could optimize the learning experience for all. Thank you.
Question-3
Topic: In order to stop the problem of food insecurity (i.e. not having enough food due to high prices), children should receive meals at schools. This plan should be paid for by the government. (Source: The Globe & Mail).
In your opinion, what are the advantages and disadvantages of providing school meals to children in need?
Title : Addressing Food Insecurity: School Meals for Children
Sample Answer:
Today, I want to discuss a pressing issue that affects the well-being of our children: food insecurity. The proposal on the table suggests providing meals at schools to combat this problem, funded by the government. Let’s delve into the advantages and disadvantages of this initiative.
Argument in Favor:
One compelling advantage of providing school meals is that it directly addresses the nutritional needs of children, ensuring they receive balanced and healthy meals. This can enhance their overall well-being, contribute to better academic performance, and even address health-related issues stemming from malnutrition. Additionally, it creates a level playing field, as all students have access to the same nutritious meals, reducing disparities in health and academic outcomes.
Argument Against:
On the flip side, critics argue that implementing such a program may place an additional burden on taxpayers. They contend that government funds could be better utilized in other areas, and there’s concern about the long-term sustainability of financially supporting such programs. Some argue that it’s the responsibility of families, not the government, to ensure their children are adequately fed.
Personal Reflection:
As we weigh these arguments, I find myself leaning towards supporting the initiative. While financial considerations are valid, investing in the well-being and future of our children is an investment in society as a whole. The potential long-term benefits, such as improved health and academic achievement, may outweigh the immediate costs.
In conclusion, addressing food insecurity through school meals is a complex issue with valid points on both sides. Striking a balance between financial responsibility and the well-being of our children is crucial. As we navigate these discussions, let’s remember that the decisions we make today shape the future for the generations to come. Thank you.